Prof. Cardinal Georges Cottier, OP
Priestly friendship
– Ongoing formation
Ongoing formation
requires adequate means that cannot simply be the extension of those used in
seminaries. This is obvious. The needs are far more complex. The
self-educational aspect is fundamental. By self-education I mean making the
effort to understand, in the light of the faith, the priest’s pastoral
experience. Self-education does not imply introversion and individualism. On
the contrary, an understanding of one’s own experience need help from one’s
spiritual director, who assists one to discern what is right and good and
conforms to divine will. Ongoing formation is in fact the means allowing the
priest to mature in sanctity. Among the aspects of this formation there is also
friendship and in particular priestly
friendship.
It is known that a
number of ascetic-spiritual authors have expressed a degree of mistrust regards
to friendship. People were warned against so-called “particular friendships”.
There were various reasons for such prudence and these reasons are still valid
today. They were wrong to start with fear of possible abuse, ignoring the
beauty of real friendship. Prayer and humility are effective protection against
the danger of deviations.
To discuss the
theological virtue of divine mercy,
Friendship is an
invitation to reciprocal encouragement to try and achieve sanctity in life.
Shared prayers, a spiritual and doctrinal exchange, participation in pastoral
concerns find natural stimulus and support in friendship. This also applies to
human formation as does practising sport, as well as travel and cultural
holidays that open one to the world and also to the needs of humankind,
especially the poor. Friendship can also gather together small groups of
priests, with regularly held meetings allowing a comparison of pastoral
problems and information and encourage cooperation. When friendship is
sufficiently profound, the fraternal
correctio can also help, as in particular it protects one from certain
defects that develop through loneliness. While the friendship discussed here is
a form of charity, openness to others will be the mark of its authenticity. If
instead it is inwardly addressed, things are not as they should be and it
becomes shared selfishness. Welcoming a brother experiencing problems,
participation in the life of the presbyterium,
loyal and simple relationships with the Bishop, are the mark of its
authenticity. The Bishop – as far as he is concerned - must encourage this form
of friendship as the expression of priestly brotherhood.