VIDEO-CONFERENCE
Prof. Dr. Rodney L. Moss
Tuesday 27 June 2006.
Race and Culture: encounter or battle with society
4. How has the Church
in Africa, through its history, confronted the question of race.
The
Church in Africa is the most dynamic and fastest growing regional Church at the
beginning of the twenty-first century. In addressing its history and the
question of race we need to be aware that this is the third period in the
history of the Church on this continent. Christianity was first introduced in
North Africa and flourished through intense missionary activity for several
centuries. It disappeared as a result of internal division and strong external
pressure from Islam. The second period of evangelisation in Africa was in the
fifteenth and sixteenth centuries in sub-Saharan Africa and confined to areas
along the west and east coasts. The
missionary thrust was a Portuguese initiative. Here, there was no strong effort
to root the faith in the culture and life of the people. As a result the church
here did not flourish. We are now in the third period of the history of the
church in Africa. This began in the nineteenth century with thousands of
missionaries coming from Europe and North America to establish Catholicism on
the African continent. The period was one of tremendous expansion accompanied
by the building of numerous churches, schools, hospitals and other development
projects.
How
has the Church in Africa, then, confronted the question of race? This is an
extremely complex problem. Different policies were adopted toward the
indigenous African people by the various colonial powers. In addition, Africa
was evangelised by many different religious orders and congregations with
differing missionary policies and methods. My assessment is, indeed, very
general with many variations that cannot even be addressed here. So, while
there have been examples of racism, especially in the South, the bigger problem
has been that of Western cultural imperialism. In this brief and general
treatment of the question of race, we will first look at how the Church has
addressed the question of race at the more universal level and then
specifically in Africa. In the second part of this presentation the attention
will turn to the greater problem of Western cultural hegemony and the
consequent need to address the inculturation of the Gospel in the soul of
Africa.
Very
soon after the discovery of the New World, the Holy See denounced those who
held that “the inhabitants of the West Indies and the Southern continents …
should be treated like irrational animals and used exclusively for our profit
and our service”.[1] In our time
John Paul ll ,strongly deplored the fact that people belonging to Christian
nations have made a strong contribution to the black slave trade.[2]
Moreover, there had, at times been a missionary compromise with the colonial
state. It would not be an exaggeration to say that in some colonies African
missionary activity had been hand in glove with political activity. Pope Paul
VI noted that “[i]t must be recognised that colonising powers have often being
furthering their own interests, power or glory”.[3]
In fairness, Pope Paul does acknowledge, however, that the Church needs to
“acknowledge the qualities and achievements of colonizers who brought science
and technical knowledge and left beneficial results of their presence in so
many underprivileged regimes”.[4]
However, the colonial legacy had at times a negative effect on evangelisation.
It must be noted that the European expansion of the nineteenth century
coincided with the growth of the Church’s mission. Lukas Malishi notes:
Christian communities, though
multiplying, were beset with strife,
intolerance between denominations,
scrambling for territory to
exclusion of others, bigotry and
sectarianism … The African could
not be blamed for concluding that the
missionary, like the colonialist,
was against the true interests of his
race and country. It was difficult
to distinguish between the message of
the gospel and the imperial
official.[5]
In
Southern Africa until the mid twentieth century and, and, indeed beyond, the
Church accommodated herself to the prevailing white attitude and colonial
mentality. Thus she drifted into institutional and social segregation. This
meant segregated parishes, schools and even seminaries. There was at this time
a disproportionate allocation of personnel and funds to the more affluent white
community. The reality of apartheid and racial segregation was taken for
granted. Moves toward the integration of church facilities such as schools and
seminaries gathered momentum only in the seventies. After the collapse of
apartheid the Catholic Church in South Africa told the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission that it could have done more in the struggle against apartheid. The
submission admits,
The complicity of the Catholic Church …
is found in
acts of omission rather than commission … Silence
in the face of ongoing and systematic
oppression at
all levels of society is perhaps the
church’s greatest
sin …With hindsight it can be said that
the church
did contribute to the creation of a
culture of human
rights, a culture of
resistance, a culture of protest.
At
the same time, she condemned gross violation of
human
rights on all sides. However … we recognise
that
more could have been done to protest the
ongoing
and systematic violation of human rights
by
the state apparatus.[6]
Attention
will focus next on the accusation that the church never took the African people
and their culture seriously.
VIDEO-CONFERENCE
Tuesday 27 June 2006.
Race and Culture: encounter and battle with society.
4. How has the Church
in Africa, through its history, confronted the question of race. Part 2 Dr. R.L. Moss
It
was mentioned in the first part of this presentation that African Church
history is extremely complicated and diverse. There is some substance in the
allegation that missionary activity in some places in Africa and at various
times was subservient to the aims of the colonial powers and even accommodated
to some extent the bias of white settlers to the native peoples, it is,
however, rather, in the area of a cultural imperialism, in the inability of
some missionaries to appreciate the rich African cultural heritage that the
larger problem lay. In suggesting that that which was African was “pagan” and
“primitive” and encouraging the indigenous people to absorb Western culture as an
essential part of the message of salvation was the larger problem in
confronting the question of race.
Had
only the words of Cardinal Lavigerie, the founder of the Missionaries of
Africa, popularly known as the White Fathers, been heeded earlier:
To succeed in transforming Africa, in their education the
young
Africans must not be turned into
black-skinned Europeans who
become misfits in their own
society and country. Be like St. Paul
who made himself Barbarian with
the Barbarians just as he was
Greek with the Greeks. St. Peter
and St. Paul did not try to make
Hebrews of the children of the
first converts of Rome, nor did St.
Irenaeus try to make Greeks of
the children of Lyons. Do not
commit the unpardonable mistake
of bringing up African children
in a French way. I forbid you to
put them in French beds to sleep;
I forbid you to give them French
food to eat; I forbid you to teach
them to read and write in French.[7]
The
Lineamenta, or outline document, that
was published prior to the Special Assembly for Africa of the Synod of Bishops
mentioned the critical importance of inculturation. It noted how the North
African Church disappeared because it
Failed
to incarnate Christianity. On the other hand, the church in Egypt and Ethiopia
survived because of the acceptance of their languages and culture in biblical
translations and the liturgy.[8] These observations are supported by the
phenomenal growth of the African Independent Churches, otherwise known as the
African Instituted Churches. These ecclesial bodies are a considerable force on
the continent in terms of membership, distribution, and growth rate. They are a
sign of rebellion against Western founded churches. Their challenge to the
church means that inculturation is a vital priority in the process of
evangelisation. Inculturation means nothing less than conversion of a culture
by the Gospel of Jesus Christ. This involves a re-expression of the Gospel by
the culture that has been evangelised. This means that the one Gospel takes a new cultural form. It becomes
a matter of living life as a Catholic in Africa.
I
would like to mention some areas that call for special attention if the Church
is to be truly African:
·
Healing. African societies link physical
health to spiritual well-being. This means that physical illness becomes a manifestation of disturbed
relationships. Consequently, healing involves the defeat of adverse spiritual
forces and the restoration of peace and reconciliation. This healing would need to be accompanied by a form of
religious ceremony. An adequate pastoral response to this conception of
sickness and health needs to be found.
·
Marriage. In many parts of the continent
up to eighty per cent of the population are not in regular canonical marriages
and are consequently deprived of the sacraments. Moreover, African societies
see marriage more as a process that takes place over months and involves both
families and the clan. Many bishops would like to integrate the Christian
sacrament into this process but there is uncertainty as to how to do it. In
addition, the consummation of marriage is not so much by sexual act as by proof
of fertility.
·
Liturgy. While it is true that much
progress has been made, for example, the Zairean rite, the Mass of the Lagunes,
and the Swahili Mass, there is still
need in other places of Africa for the liturgy to become a real celebration of
African life in worship that mirrors more adequately the genius of the African
people.
·
Reverence for ancestors is another very
important part of African culture. “Everything in life is connected with the
ancestors … the birth of a child, sickness, luck, fortune, wealth, marriage,
recreation etc. In all these the intervention of the ancestors is invoked”.[9]
Thus the ancestors are still part of the living community and consequently
exert an influence in one’s life. This is certainly an area ripe for
inculturation. Even, Pope John Paul
referred to the ancestor cult as a preparation for understanding the
communion of saints.[10]
In
order to counter the insensitivities of the past and further the process of
inculturation, the traditional method in the early church of planting the
Gospel, I would like to suggest that we return to the treasures of traditional
African cultures. John Schumacher, an American Jesuit scholar offers four
suggestions: first, a recognition of “the essential cultural plurality in unity
which exists within the universal church”[11];
secondly, counter the demonisation and vilification of traditional religions
and recognise that some of their values such as unity, solidarity, peace and
rapprochement are implicitly Christian; thirdly, recognise that Africa has a
contribution to make to the universal Church and fourthly that the sufferings
of the Church in the South can lead the universal Church to a
wholehearted engagement in the
struggle for peace and justice in the world as a whole.[12]
In
conclusion, then, race and culture are so closely linked that to work towards
overcoming the legacy of the past means working to reconnect with the living
indigenous traditions of Africa and cultivating a real interdependence with the
universal church.
[1] Pope Paul III, Bull Sublimis Deus, June 2, 1537
[2] Pontifical
Commission Justice and Peace, The Church
and Racism:Toward a More Fraternal Society, No. 4
[3] Pope Paul
V1, Populorum Progressio, March, 22,
1967, No.1
[4] ibid., No 7
[5] Malisha, L.
Introduction to the History of
Christianity in Africa, Taboro:Tanganyika Mission Press, p.131
[6] Catholic Church Submission to the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission, August 15th. 1997
[7] Kilaini, M.
The Catholic Evangelisation of Kagera in
North-West Tanzania: The Pioneer Period 1892- 1912,
Doctoral dissertation, Gregorian
University, Rome, 1990, p.vii.
[8] Lineamenta-
Synod for Africa. Historical introduction No. 4
[9] Bishop
Haushiku cited in Reese, T.J. “The Synod on the Church in Africa”, America, 170( 1994).
[10] cited in
ibid.
[11] Byamungu,
G.T.M. “Construing newer ‘windows’ of ecumenism for Africa: A Catholic
Perspective”, The Ecumenical Review,
53( 2001), p. 349
[12] Ibid.